Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage
RPCs| Provider | Wallet call latency | Chains covered | Method coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlockSec Anti-MEV | 118 ms | 2 | 7 |
| PancakeSwap MEV Guard | 23 ms | 1 | 6 |
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs PancakeSwap MEV Guard
PancakeSwap MEV Guard leads on the only live benchmark. PancakeSwap MEV Guard wins on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage (23 ms vs 118 ms).
BlockSec Anti-MEV
BlockSec is a blockchain security company behind the Phalcon toolchain, audits and attack monitoring. Its Anti-MEV RPC applies private transaction routing to shield Ethereum and BSC users from sandwich attacks.
PancakeSwap MEV Guard
PancakeSwap is the largest DEX on BNB Chain. MEV Guard is its user-facing protected RPC, powered by 48 Club infrastructure and shipped as the default anti-sandwich endpoint for PancakeSwap traders.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs PancakeSwap MEV Guard: which one is better?
BlockSec Anti-MEV and PancakeSwap MEV Guard are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. PancakeSwap MEV Guard leads on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BlockSec Anti-MEV or PancakeSwap MEV Guard?
On the Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage benchmark, PancakeSwap MEV Guard leads at 23 ms versus BlockSec Anti-MEV at 118 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BlockSec Anti-MEV vs PancakeSwap MEV Guard comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.