Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBNB
Leads3.99 s
- p99
- 13.73 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 968
Injective
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1provisional
BNB vs Injective
BNB leads on the only live benchmark. BNB wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.99 s vs 7.50 s).
BNB
Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBNB
Trails27.33 s
- p99
- 14.7 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 862
Injective
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesBNB
Trails46.73 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 43provisional
Injective
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
BNB vs Injective: which one is better?
BNB and Injective are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BNB or Injective?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, BNB leads at 3.99 s versus Injective at 7.50 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BNB vs Injective comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.