Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsBNB
Leads$0.000870
- p99
- $0.0115
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 20,159
Linea
Trails$0.0145
- p99
- $0.0825
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 20,159
BNB vs Linea
BNB leads on both live benchmarks. BNB wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000870 vs $0.0145), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (27.02 s vs 3.8 min).
BNB
Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.
Linea
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBNB
Trails3.99 s
- p99
- 13.95 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 757
Linea
No data in window
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBNB
Trails1.4 min
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 56provisional
Linea
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBNB
Leads27.02 s
- p99
- 4.7 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 830
Linea
Trails3.8 min
- rank
- #16
- samples
- 41provisional
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesBNB
Trails45.91 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 57provisional
Linea
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
BNB vs Linea: which one is better?
BNB and Linea are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, BNB or Linea?
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, BNB leads at $0.000870 versus Linea at $0.0145. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BNB vs Linea comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.