Fastest free Boba Network RPC, live no-key endpoint latency
RPCsBoba Foundation
Leads258 ms
- p99
- 258 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 1
dRPC
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Boba Foundation | dRPC |
|---|---|---|
| EU-West | 255 ms | 286 ms |
| Singapore | 261 ms | 285 ms |
Boba Foundation vs dRPC
Boba Foundation leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, dRPC on 0. Boba Foundation wins on Fastest free Boba Network RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (258 ms vs 304 ms).
dRPC
Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Boba Foundation vs dRPC: which one is better?
Boba Foundation and dRPC are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Boba Foundation leads on Fastest free Boba Network RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free boba network rpc, live no-key endpoint latency, Boba Foundation or dRPC?
On the Fastest free Boba Network RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, Boba Foundation leads at 258 ms versus dRPC at 304 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Boba Foundation vs dRPC comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.