BuilderNet vs Other

Name: BuilderNet vs Other OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

BuilderNet leads on the only live benchmark. BuilderNet wins on Ethereum block builder market share (16.7% vs 9.05%).

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 31 Aug 2026 07:08:34 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

BuilderNet

Decentralized block-building network initiated by Flashbots, with Beaverbuild and Nethermind among the early node operators. Blocks are built inside TEEs by multiple operators and carry the `BuilderNet` extraData tag; conceived as the mutualized counterweight to private-builder concentration.

Other

Aggregate long-tail bucket, not a single provider. On the block-builder bench it collects blocks whose extraData tag is not in the curated attribution table; every raw string is logged so named rows can be added as the table grows.

Side by side measurements

Ethereum block builder market share

Trading

BuilderNet

Leads

16.7 %

p99: 16.7%
rank: #3
samples: 1,196

Other

Trails

9.05 %

p99: 9.05%
rank: #4
samples: 649

Attribution relies on the extraData tag each builder voluntarily stamps. A builder can change or strip its tag; unrecognized tags land in Other and raw strings are logged so the table grows. The Vanilla row (locally built) could be marginally overstated if a builder uses a client-default tag; the relay cross-check surfaces this. High share is a centralization datapoint, not a quality ranking.

Frequently asked questions

BuilderNet vs Other: which one is better?

BuilderNet and Other are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BuilderNet leads on Ethereum block builder market share. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, BuilderNet or Other?

On the Ethereum block builder market share benchmark, BuilderNet leads at 16.7% versus Other at 9.05%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BuilderNet vs Other comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.