Bybit vs Crypto.com

Name: Bybit vs Crypto.com OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Bybit leads on the only live benchmark. Bybit wins on iOS App Store rating (4.69x vs 4.66x).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:16:07 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Bybit

Bybit is one of the largest centralized derivatives exchanges, with USDT-margined linear perpetuals on hundreds of pairs and funding settled on 8 hour (some pairs 4 hour) periods.

Crypto.com

Crypto.com is a Singapore-headquartered centralized exchange serving 100M+ users globally. The app offers spot and derivatives trading, a Visa card, DeFi wallet and staking, making it one of the most feature-complete crypto super apps on iOS.

Side by side measurements

Crypto trading app iOS ratings: Coinbase vs Robinhood vs Crypto.com vs Bybit, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
Bybit	4.69x	46.9K
Crypto.com	4.66x	332.4K

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

Bybit vs Crypto.com: which one is better?

Bybit and Crypto.com are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Bybit leads on iOS App Store rating. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is higher-rated, Bybit or Crypto.com?

On the Crypto trading app iOS ratings benchmark, Bybit leads at 4.69x versus Crypto.com at 4.66x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Bybit vs Crypto.com comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.