Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesCelo
Trails25.7 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 8provisional
Osmosis
Leads46.76 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 154
Celo vs Osmosis
Osmosis leads on the only live benchmark. Osmosis wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (46.76 s vs 25.7 min).
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Celo and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Osmosis leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Osmosis?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Osmosis leads at 46.76 s versus Celo at 25.7 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.