cheqd vs NodeStake

NodeStake leads on the only live benchmark. NodeStake wins on Fastest free cheqd RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (165 ms vs 346 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
cheqd logo
cheqd

cheqd official public Tendermint RPC node for cheqd-mainnet-1. Keyless endpoint maintained by the cheqd Network team.

NodeStake logo
NodeStake

NodeStake community validator and public RPC operator. Provides keyless Tendermint RPC endpoints for multiple Cosmos SDK chains.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

cheqd vs NodeStake: which one is better?

cheqd and NodeStake are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. NodeStake leads on Fastest free cheqd RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, cheqd or NodeStake?

On the Fastest free cheqd RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, NodeStake leads at 165 ms versus cheqd at 346 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the cheqd vs NodeStake comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.