OpenChainBench

CMI vs HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread

CMI leads on the only live benchmark. CMI wins on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard (2.23% vs 2.16%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
CM
CMI
HS
HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid validator leaderboard: live net APR, uptime, commission

Blockchains

CMI

Leads

2.23 %

p99
2.23%
rank
#3
samples
849,071,000

HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread

Trails

2.16 %

p99
2.16%
rank
#18
samples
763,317,000
Net yield
CMIn/aHypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpreadn/a

net_yield = predictedApr.day x uptimeFraction from /info validatorSummaries. No MEV layer at the validator level on Hyperliquid; the centralised sequencer captures order-flow value upstream. Jailed validators land at 0 bps regardless of published APR. APRs cluster at 200 to 225 bps across the active set; commission rate is the primary differentiator for delegators.

Frequently asked questions

CMI vs HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread: which one is better?

CMI and HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CMI leads on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher net yield, CMI or HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread?

On the Hyperliquid validator leaderboard benchmark, CMI leads at 2.23% versus HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread at 2.16%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the CMI vs HypurrCorea - Spacebar x DeSpread comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.