Coin98 vs Gem Wallet

Name: Coin98 vs Gem Wallet OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Coin98 vs Gem Wallet on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:22:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Coin98

Coin98 is a multi chain wallet super app whose perpetuals interface aggregates Hyperliquid alongside GMX and other venues, routing Hyperliquid fills via a registered builder code.

Gem Wallet

Gem Wallet is a multichain self custody mobile wallet with a built in Trade Perpetuals section that routes orders directly into Hyperliquid via a registered builder code.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps	Time since last fill
Coin98	-	-	-	24 h
Gem Walletprovisional	$3,899.75	3	0.022%	24.5 min

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Frequently asked questions

Coin98 vs Gem Wallet: which one is better?

Coin98 and Gem Wallet are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Coin98 vs Gem Wallet comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.