Coin98 vs Nansen

Coin98 vs Nansen on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Coin98 logo
Coin98

Coin98 is a multi chain wallet super app whose perpetuals interface aggregates Hyperliquid alongside GMX and other venues, routing Hyperliquid fills via a registered builder code.

Nansen logo
Nansen

Nansen is the onchain analytics platform; its perps trading product routes orders into Hyperliquid and earns builder fees under the NSN builder code.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading
ProviderVolume routedUsers 24hEffective fee bpsTime since last fill
Coin98---24 h
Nansen$1.72M1150.038%0.9 s

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Rolling 24h · Builder fees collectedRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Coin98 vs Nansen: which one is better?

Coin98 and Nansen are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Coin98 vs Nansen comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.