Crypto.com vs Invo

Name: Crypto.com vs Invo OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Crypto.com leads on the only live benchmark. Crypto.com wins on iOS App Store rating (4.66x vs 4.29x).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:16:07 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Crypto.com

Crypto.com is a Singapore-headquartered centralized exchange serving 100M+ users globally. The app offers spot and derivatives trading, a Visa card, DeFi wallet and staking, making it one of the most feature-complete crypto super apps on iOS.

Invo

Invo is a Hyperliquid-powered social trading mobile app supporting 170+ perp pairs with copy-trading and a registered builder code (HL referral code INVO, 25k+ referrals).

Side by side measurements

Crypto trading app iOS ratings: Coinbase vs Robinhood vs Crypto.com vs Bybit, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
Crypto.com	4.66x	332.4K
Invo	4.29x	414

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

Crypto.com vs Invo: which one is better?

Crypto.com and Invo are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Crypto.com leads on iOS App Store rating. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is higher-rated, Crypto.com or Invo?

On the Crypto trading app iOS ratings benchmark, Crypto.com leads at 4.66x versus Invo at 4.29x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Crypto.com vs Invo comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.