dRPC vs Glif

dRPC leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Glif on 1. Glif wins on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency (248 ms vs 311 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Glif logo
Glif

Glif is a community-operated Filecoin node infrastructure provider. Their public endpoint (api.node.glif.io/rpc/v1) is the canonical keyless FEVM gateway for Filecoin mainnet (chain 314).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs Glif: which one is better?

dRPC and Glif are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Glif leads on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest free filecoin rpc, live no-key fevm endpoint latency, dRPC or Glif?

On the Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency benchmark, Glif leads at 248 ms versus dRPC at 311 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs Glif comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.