dRPC vs Lisk

dRPC leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Lisk on 0. dRPC wins on Fastest free Lisk RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (14 ms vs 326 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Lisk logo
Lisk

Lisk's official public RPC (rpc.api.lisk.com) for the OP Stack L2 focused on emerging-market Web3 adoption (chain 1135). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs Lisk: which one is better?

dRPC and Lisk are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Fastest free Lisk RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest free lisk rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, dRPC or Lisk?

On the Fastest free Lisk RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, dRPC leads at 14 ms versus Lisk at 326 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs Lisk comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.