dRPC vs Purroof Group

dRPC leads on the only live benchmark. dRPC wins on Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency (14 ms vs 174 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Purroof Group logo
Purroof Group

Community-operated Hyperliquid validator and public RPC (rpc.purroofgroup.com). One of the earliest independent HyperEVM RPC providers; keyless, community-maintained.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs Purroof Group: which one is better?

dRPC and Purroof Group are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, dRPC or Purroof Group?

On the Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency benchmark, dRPC leads at 14 ms versus Purroof Group at 174 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs Purroof Group comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.