dRPC vs Stakely

dRPC leads on the only live benchmark. dRPC wins on Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency (14 ms vs 458 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Stakely logo
Stakely

Non-custodial staking + infra provider running keyless public RPC endpoints across HyperEVM, Cosmos, Solana and 30+ chains. Founded 2019, EU-based, self-hosted validator fleet.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs Stakely: which one is better?

dRPC and Stakely are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, dRPC or Stakely?

On the Fastest free Hyperliquid RPC, live no-key HyperEVM endpoint latency benchmark, dRPC leads at 14 ms versus Stakely at 458 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs Stakely comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.