dRPC vs zkSync

dRPC leads on the only live benchmark. dRPC wins on Fastest free zkSync Era RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (169 ms vs 219 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
dRPC logo
dRPC

Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

dRPC vs zkSync: which one is better?

dRPC and zkSync are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dRPC leads on Fastest free zkSync Era RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, dRPC or zkSync?

On the Fastest free zkSync Era RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, dRPC leads at 169 ms versus zkSync at 219 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dRPC vs zkSync comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.