Enso vs KyberSwap

Name: Enso vs KyberSwap OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

KyberSwap leads on the only live benchmark. KyberSwap wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (237 ms vs 1.38 s).

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 24 Aug 2026 03:24:17 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Enso

DeFi shared engine that maps onchain interactions into composable actions. The Route API computes optimal multi-step paths across protocols and chains, abstracting approvals, swaps, vault entries, and bridges into a single call.

KyberSwap

EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

Enso

Trails

1.38 s

p99: 4.34 s
rank: #5
samples: 4,310

KyberSwap

Leads

237 ms

p99: 1.73 s
rank: #1
samples: 4,319

Per chain · per region

Chain	Provider	US East	EU West	Singapore	Aggregate
Ethereum	Enso	1.53 s	1.50 s	1.49 s	1.51 s
Ethereum	KyberSwap	429 ms	422 ms	360 ms	404 ms
Base	Enso	1.24 s	1.03 s	943 ms	1.07 s
Base	KyberSwap	362 ms	358 ms	354 ms	358 ms
Arbitrum	Enso	1.48 s	1.38 s	1.36 s	1.41 s
Arbitrum	KyberSwap	95 ms	106 ms	79 ms	93 ms
BSC	Enso	1.54 s	1.53 s	1.52 s	1.53 s
BSC	KyberSwap	103 ms	93 ms	78 ms	91 ms

Frequently asked questions

Enso vs KyberSwap: which one is better?

Enso and KyberSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Enso or KyberSwap?

On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 237 ms versus Enso at 1.38 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Enso vs KyberSwap comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.