Enso vs LI.FI

Name: Enso vs LI.FI OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

LI.FI leads on the only live benchmark. LI.FI wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (708 ms vs 1.37 s).

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 24 Aug 2026 05:46:17 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Enso

DeFi shared engine that maps onchain interactions into composable actions. The Route API computes optimal multi-step paths across protocols and chains, abstracting approvals, swaps, vault entries, and bridges into a single call.

LI.FI

Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator. Routes swaps across bridges and liquidity sources via a single API, with EVM and Solana support.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

Enso

Trails

1.37 s

p99: 4.36 s
rank: #5
samples: 4,311

LI.FI

Leads

708 ms

p99: 2.29 s
rank: #3
samples: 2,677

Per chain · per region

Chain	Provider	US East	EU West	Singapore	Aggregate
Ethereum	Enso	1.53 s	1.50 s	1.49 s	1.51 s
Ethereum	LI.FI	782 ms	785 ms	702 ms	756 ms
Base	Enso	1.22 s	995 ms	940 ms	1.05 s
Base	LI.FI	802 ms	779 ms	748 ms	776 ms
Arbitrum	Enso	1.48 s	1.37 s	1.35 s	1.40 s
Arbitrum	LI.FI	639 ms	607 ms	481 ms	576 ms
BSC	Enso	1.54 s	1.51 s	1.51 s	1.52 s
BSC	LI.FI	753 ms	738 ms	692 ms	728 ms

Frequently asked questions

Enso vs LI.FI: which one is better?

Enso and LI.FI are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. LI.FI leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Enso or LI.FI?

On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, LI.FI leads at 708 ms versus Enso at 1.37 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Enso vs LI.FI comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

LI.FI vs Mobula

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.