EOSUSA vs Greymass

Greymass leads on the only live benchmark. Greymass wins on Fastest free WAX RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (295 ms vs 650 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
EOSUSA logo
EOSUSA

EOSUSA is a block producer operating on multiple Antelope chains. Provides a public WAX mainnet API node (wax.eosusa.io), no API key required.

Greymass logo
Greymass

Greymass is a block producer and tooling developer for Antelope-based chains (EOS, WAX). Operates public API nodes for EOS and WAX mainnet, no API key required.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

EOSUSA vs Greymass: which one is better?

EOSUSA and Greymass are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Greymass leads on Fastest free WAX RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, EOSUSA or Greymass?

On the Fastest free WAX RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, Greymass leads at 295 ms versus EOSUSA at 650 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the EOSUSA vs Greymass comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.