Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsEthereum
Leads$0.00746
- p99
- $0.6232
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 20,159
Linea
Trails$0.0145
- p99
- $0.0825
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 20,159
Split decision: Ethereum leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.00746 vs $0.0145); Linea leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (3.8 min vs 4.1 min).
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Ethereum
Leads$0.00746
Linea
Trails$0.0145
Ethereum
Trails14.5 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails17.1 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails4.1 min
Linea
Leads3.8 min
Ethereum
Trails16.9 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum and Linea are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Linea leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Ethereum leads at $0.00746 versus Linea at $0.0145. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Linea leads at 3.8 min (provisional) versus Ethereum at 4.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.