Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsEthereum
Leads$0.00267
- p99
- $0.1536
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 40,319
Linea
Trails$0.0152
- p99
- $0.0510
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 40,319
Ethereum leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Linea on 1. Ethereum wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.00267 vs $0.0152), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.2 min vs 82.5 min). Linea wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (3.5 min vs 4.1 min).
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Ethereum
Leads$0.00267
Linea
Trails$0.0152
Ethereum
Trails14.9 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum
Leads17.2 min
Linea
Trails82.5 min
Ethereum
Trails4.1 min
Linea
Leads3.5 min
Ethereum
Trails4.0 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails17.1 min
Linea
No data in window
Ethereum and Linea are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Linea leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Ethereum leads at $0.00267 versus Linea at $0.0152. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Linea leads at 3.5 min versus Ethereum at 4.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.