Ethereum vs Linea

Ethereum leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Linea on 1. Ethereum wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.00267 vs $0.0152), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.2 min vs 82.5 min). Linea wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (3.5 min vs 4.1 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Linea logo
Linea

ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Linea: which one is better?

Ethereum and Linea are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Linea leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 l1 and l2 chains, Ethereum or Linea?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Ethereum leads at $0.00267 versus Linea at $0.0152. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ethereum or Linea?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Linea leads at 3.5 min versus Ethereum at 4.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Linea comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.