Ethereum vs Mantle

Ethereum leads on 2 of 4 shared benchmarks, Mantle on 2. Ethereum wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.2 min vs 25.0 min), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (17.1 min vs 45.0 min). Mantle wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000412 vs $0.00349), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (1.3 min vs 4.1 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Mantle: which one is better?

Ethereum and Mantle are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. Mantle leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest chainlink ccip source chain by end-to-end delivery latency, Ethereum or Mantle?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Ethereum leads at 17.2 min versus Mantle at 25.0 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 l1 and l2 chains, Ethereum or Mantle?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Mantle leads at $0.000412 versus Ethereum at $0.00349. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Mantle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.