Ethereum vs Mantle

Ethereum leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Mantle on 2. Ethereum wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.1 min vs 25.0 min). Mantle wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000575 vs $0.00750), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (1.0 min vs 4.1 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Mantle: which one is better?

Ethereum and Mantle are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. Mantle leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ethereum or Mantle?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Ethereum leads at 17.1 min versus Mantle at 25.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Ethereum or Mantle?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Mantle leads at $0.000575 versus Ethereum at $0.00750. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Mantle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.