Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesEthereum
Trails15.1 min
- p99
- 19.9 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 771
Scroll
No data in window
Ethereum vs Scroll
Ethereum leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Scroll on 0. Ethereum wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (4.1 min vs 5.3 min).
Ethereum
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Scroll
Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesEthereum
Trails17.3 min
- p99
- 28.4 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 358
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesEthereum
Leads4.1 min
- p99
- 18.8 min
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,055
Scroll
Trails5.3 min
- p99
- 9.9 min
- rank
- #18
- samples
- 36
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesEthereum
Trails4.0 min
- p99
- 5.0 min
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 572
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesEthereum
Trails17.1 min
- p99
- 20.0 min
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 182
Scroll
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Ethereum vs Scroll: which one is better?
Ethereum and Scroll are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ethereum leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ethereum or Scroll?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Ethereum leads at 4.1 min versus Scroll at 5.3 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ethereum vs Scroll comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.