Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesEthereum
Trails239.71 min
- p99
- 298.79 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 205
Sonic
Leads24.06 s
- p99
- 29.88 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 38
Ethereum vs Sonic
Ethereum leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Sonic on 1. Sonic wins on Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (24.06 s vs 239.71 s).
Ethereum
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Ethereum vs Sonic: which one is better?
Ethereum and Sonic are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Sonic leads on Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Ethereum or Sonic?
On the Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Sonic leads at 24.06 s versus Ethereum at 239.71 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ethereum vs Sonic comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.