Extended vs Polymarket

Extended leads on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 1. Extended wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.027% vs 0.043%), Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.43 bps vs 3.00 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($342.39M vs $27.90M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0037% vs 0.017%). Polymarket wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.291x vs 1.725x). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h7 shared benchmarks
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Polymarket logo
Polymarket

The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Extended

Leads

1.43 bps

p99
3.12 bps
rank
#13
samples
2,832

Polymarket

Trails

3.00 bps

p99
2.10 bps
rank
#18
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Extendedn/aPolymarketn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

1.725x

p99
2.52x
rank
#15
samples
2,880

Polymarket

Leads

0.291x

p99
0.393x
rank
#4
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aPolymarketn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Extended

Leads

75.8 bps

p99
57.9 bps
rank
—
samples
418

Polymarket

Trails

89.5 bps

p99
51.6 bps
rank
—
samples
470
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Extendedn/aPolymarketn/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 24h · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs Polymarket: which one is better?

Extended and Polymarket are compared on 7 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Extended or Polymarket?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Extended leads at 0.027% versus Polymarket at 0.043%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), Extended or Polymarket?

On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Polymarket leads at 0.291x versus Extended at 1.725x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs Polymarket comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.