FOMO vs Kraken

Name: FOMO vs Kraken OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

FOMO leads on the only live benchmark. FOMO wins on iOS App Store rating (4.77x vs 4.73x).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:21:07 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Kraken

Kraken is a US-registered centralized exchange founded in 2011, offering spot, margin and futures trading across 300+ assets with a strong reputation for security and regulatory compliance.

Side by side measurements

Crypto trading app iOS ratings: Coinbase vs Robinhood vs Crypto.com vs Bybit, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
FOMO	4.77x	7,625
Kraken	4.73x	33.7K

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs Kraken: which one is better?

FOMO and Kraken are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on iOS App Store rating. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is higher-rated, FOMO or Kraken?

On the Crypto trading app iOS ratings benchmark, FOMO leads at 4.77x versus Kraken at 4.73x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs Kraken comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

FOMO vs pump.fun

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.