Helius vs OLI

Name: Helius vs OLI OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Helius vs OLI on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:24:56 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Helius

Solana RPC and data provider. Enhanced transactions, webhooks, DAS API for assets, and standard JSON-RPC.

OLI

Open Labels Initiative, a community standard and shared dataset for EVM address labels. Distributes labels via GitHub and a public API.

Side by side measurements

Best wallet labeling API provider

Aggregators

Helius

No data in window

OLI

Leads

50.4 %

p99: 50.4%
rank: #3
samples: 5,580

Coverage means the provider returned a non-empty label for the probed address, it says nothing about label quality or correctness. Read the EOA vs contract split before concluding: a provider can look strong overall while only labeling contracts (verified-source names) and missing every wallet. The Success column is fetch reliability (share of API calls that did not error), not labeling accuracy.

Frequently asked questions

Helius vs OLI: which one is better?

Helius and OLI are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Helius vs OLI comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.