Fastest free Hemi RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsHemi Labs
Leads175 ms
- p99
- 346 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 382
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Hemi Labs | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 175 ms | 720 ms |
| Singapore | 175 ms | 710 ms |
Hemi Labs vs Thirdweb
Hemi Labs leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Hemi Labs wins on Fastest free Hemi RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (175 ms vs 715 ms).
Hemi Labs
Hemi Labs' official public RPC (rpc.hemi.network/rpc) for the Bitcoin+Ethereum hybrid L2 with dual-VM architecture running both EVM and Bitcoin script (chain 43111). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Hemi Labs vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Hemi Labs and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hemi Labs leads on Fastest free Hemi RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free hemi rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Hemi Labs or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Hemi RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Hemi Labs leads at 175 ms versus Thirdweb at 715 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Hemi Labs vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.