Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInjective
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 4provisional
Mantle
No data in window
VAA finalization
Injectiven/aMantlen/a
Injective vs Mantle
Injective vs Mantle on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Mantle
Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Mantle
Trails54.38 s
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 39provisional
LayerZero delivery
Injectiven/aMantlen/a
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Mantle
Trails55.0 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 1provisional
Axelar GMP delivery
Injectiven/aMantlen/a
Frequently asked questions
Injective vs Mantle: which one is better?
Injective and Mantle are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Injective vs Mantle comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.