Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInjective
Leads7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1provisional
Optimism
Trails17.5 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 1provisional
Injective vs Optimism
Injective leads on the only live benchmark. Injective wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 17.5 min).
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Optimism
Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Optimism
Trails1.2 min
- p99
- 24.4 min
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 811
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Optimism
Trails25.0 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 11provisional
Frequently asked questions
Injective vs Optimism: which one is better?
Injective and Optimism are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Injective leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Injective or Optimism?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Injective leads at 7.50 s (provisional) versus Optimism at 17.5 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Injective vs Optimism comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.