Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesInjective
Trails7.50 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1provisional
Polygon
Leads6.12 s
- p99
- 14.57 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 139
Injective vs Polygon
Polygon leads on the only live benchmark. Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (6.12 s vs 7.50 s).
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Polygon
Trails1.8 min
- p99
- 19.6 min
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 149
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Polygon
Trails47.50 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 23provisional
Frequently asked questions
Injective vs Polygon: which one is better?
Injective and Polygon are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Injective or Polygon?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 6.12 s versus Injective at 7.50 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Injective vs Polygon comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.