Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesInjective
No data in window
Sonic
Trails24.03 s
- p99
- 29.88 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 37
Injective vs Sonic
Injective vs Sonic on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Injective vs Sonic: which one is better?
Injective and Sonic are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Injective vs Sonic comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.