Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsKava Labs
Leads231 ms
- p99
- 916 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 1,166
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Kava Labs | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 225 ms | 609 ms |
| EU-West | 225 ms | 693 ms |
| Singapore | 243 ms | 618 ms |
Kava Labs vs Thirdweb
Kava Labs leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Kava Labs wins on Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (231 ms vs 640 ms).
Kava Labs
Kava Labs' official public EVM RPC (evm.kava.io) for the Cosmos SDK Layer 1 with native EVM execution (chain 2222). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Kava Labs vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Kava Labs and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Kava Labs leads on Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free kava rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Kava Labs or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Kava RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Kava Labs leads at 231 ms versus Thirdweb at 640 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Kava Labs vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.