Lava Network vs LavenderFive

Name: Lava Network vs LavenderFive OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Lava Network vs LavenderFive on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 07 Sep 2026 15:11:48 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Lava Network

Lava Network is a decentralized RPC mesh with permissionless validators. Public no-key endpoints work for Ethereum (`eth1.lava.build`) and Arbitrum (`arb1.lava.build`); other chains require an account-issued key.

LavenderFive

Cosmos validator running multi-chain no-key RPC endpoints under rpc.lavenderfive.com/<chain> and lcd.lavenderfive.com/<chain>. Covers Osmosis, Cosmos Hub, Neutron, Injective and 20+ other Cosmos SDK chains.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free Cosmos Hub RPC, live no-key Cosmos SDK endpoint latency

RPCs

Lava Network

No data in window

LavenderFive

Trails

258 ms

p99: 364 ms
rank: #3
samples: 4,316

Frequently asked questions

Lava Network vs LavenderFive: which one is better?

Lava Network and LavenderFive are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Lava Network vs LavenderFive comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.