Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesLinea
No data in window
Osmosis
Trails52.81 s
- p99
- 118.42 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 39
Linea vs Osmosis
Linea vs Osmosis on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.
Linea
ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Linea vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Linea and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Linea vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.