OpenChainBench

Linea vs Polygon

Polygon leads on the only live benchmark. Polygon wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (1.7 min vs 3.8 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Linea logo
Linea

ConsenSys zkEVM rollup with a prover-bound block cadence. Idle periods batch into longer intervals (p50 around 3-6 s) while busy periods produce blocks closer to the nominal 2 s mark.

Polygon logo
Polygon

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Linea vs Polygon: which one is better?

Linea and Polygon are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Linea or Polygon?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Polygon leads at 1.7 min versus Linea at 3.8 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Linea vs Polygon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.