Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMantle
No data in window
Moonbeam
Trails40.31 s
- p99
- 59.45 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 11
Mantle vs Moonbeam
Mantle vs Moonbeam on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Mantle
Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesMantle
No data in window
Moonbeam
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMantle
Trails98.57 min
- p99
- 119.58 s
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 20
Moonbeam
No data in window
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMantle
No data in window
Moonbeam
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesMantle
No data in window
Moonbeam
Trails105.35 min
- p99
- 166.03 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 51
Frequently asked questions
Mantle vs Moonbeam: which one is better?
Mantle and Moonbeam are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Mantle vs Moonbeam comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.