Mantle vs Optimism

Split decision: Mantle leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (1.81 s vs 1.96 s) and Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (59.06 s vs 1.3 min); Optimism leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (17.5 min vs 21.4 min) and Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (25.6 min vs 50.0 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Optimism logo
Optimism

Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Mantle vs Optimism: which one is better?

Mantle and Optimism are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Mantle leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. Optimism leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Mantle or Optimism?

On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Mantle leads at 1.81 s versus Optimism at 1.96 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Mantle or Optimism?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Optimism leads at 17.5 min (provisional) versus Mantle at 21.4 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Mantle vs Optimism comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.