Mantle vs Osmosis

Name: Mantle vs Osmosis OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Mantle vs Osmosis on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:30:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Osmosis

Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.

Side by side measurements

Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery

Bridges

Mantle

No data in window

Osmosis

Trails

52.81 s

p99: 118.42 s
rank: #2
samples: 39

Frequently asked questions

Mantle vs Osmosis: which one is better?

Mantle and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Mantle vs Osmosis comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.