Mantle vs Osmosis

Name: Mantle vs Osmosis OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Mantle vs Osmosis on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 09 Sep 2026 20:55:09 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Osmosis

Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.

Side by side measurements

Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery

Bridges

Mantle

No data in window

Osmosis

Trails

45.42 s

p99: 2.0 min
rank: #3
samples: 284

Frequently asked questions

Mantle vs Osmosis: which one is better?

Mantle and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Mantle vs Osmosis comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.