xStocks price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 12 equities on Solana
RWAMETA
Leads0.017 %
- p99
- 0.50%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 3,306
QQQx
Trails0.11 %
- p99
- 0.38%
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 3,306
META vs QQQx
META leads on the only live benchmark. META wins on xStocks price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 12 equities on Solana (0.017% vs 0.11%).
META
Meta Platforms tokenized equity measured across issuers on the RWA benchmarks: Robinhood's token on Robinhood Chain (Uniswap v4 vs USDG) and Backed's xStock on Solana (Jupiter executable mid vs USDC), each tracked live against the real market price.
QQQx
Invesco QQQ Nasdaq 100 ETF, tokenized by Backed as QQQx on Solana. Tracked live against the real ETF price on the xStocks peg benchmark.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
META vs QQQx: which one is better?
META and QQQx are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. META leads on xStocks price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 12 equities on Solana. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, META or QQQx?
On the xStocks price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 12 equities on Solana benchmark, META leads at 0.017% versus QQQx at 0.11%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the META vs QQQx comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.