Fastest free Metis RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsMetis
Leads245 ms
- p99
- 261 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 352
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Metis | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 245 ms | 621 ms |
| EU-West | 237 ms | 621 ms |
| Singapore | 253 ms | 621 ms |
Metis vs Thirdweb
Metis leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Metis wins on Fastest free Metis RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (245 ms vs 621 ms).
Metis
Metis's official Andromeda public RPC (andromeda.metis.io) for the optimistic rollup with a decentralized sequencer network and METIS gas token (chain 1088). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Metis vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Metis and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Metis leads on Fastest free Metis RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free metis rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Metis or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Metis RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Metis leads at 245 ms versus Thirdweb at 621 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Metis vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.