Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMonad
Leads4.06 s
- p99
- 9.82 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 22
Moonbeam
Trails40.31 s
- p99
- 59.45 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 11
Monad vs Moonbeam
Monad leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Moonbeam on 0. Monad wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.06 s vs 40.31 s).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesMonad
Trails90.00 min
- p99
- 119.40 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2
Moonbeam
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMonad
Trails23.06 s
- p99
- 1117.52 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 55
Moonbeam
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Monad vs Moonbeam: which one is better?
Monad and Moonbeam are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Monad leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Monad or Moonbeam?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Monad leads at 4.06 s versus Moonbeam at 40.31 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Monad vs Moonbeam comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.