Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMoonbeam
Trails40.31 s
- p99
- 59.45 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 11
Optimism
No data in window
Moonbeam vs Optimism
Moonbeam vs Optimism on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Optimism
Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Optimism
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Optimism
Trails93.02 min
- p99
- 5400.00 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 159
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Optimism
Trails25.00 s
- p99
- 29.90 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 40
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
Trails105.41 min
- p99
- 167.37 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 48
Optimism
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Moonbeam vs Optimism: which one is better?
Moonbeam and Optimism are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Moonbeam vs Optimism comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.