Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
Trails105.34 min
- p99
- 165.44 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 53
Osmosis
Leads52.81 s
- p99
- 118.42 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 39
Moonbeam vs Osmosis
Moonbeam leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Osmosis on 1. Osmosis wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (52.81 s vs 105.34 s).
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Moonbeam vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Moonbeam and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Osmosis leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest axelar gmp source chain by end-to-end delivery, Moonbeam or Osmosis?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Osmosis leads at 52.81 s versus Moonbeam at 105.34 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Moonbeam vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.