Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMoonbeam
Trails40.31 s
- p99
- 59.45 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 11
Scroll
No data in window
Moonbeam vs Scroll
Moonbeam vs Scroll on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Scroll
Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Scroll
Trails223.65 min
- p99
- 573.03 s
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 18
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
No data in window
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesMoonbeam
Trails105.41 min
- p99
- 167.37 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 48
Scroll
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Moonbeam vs Scroll: which one is better?
Moonbeam and Scroll are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Moonbeam vs Scroll comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.