Moonshot vs Robinhood Chain

Name: Moonshot vs Robinhood Chain OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Robinhood Chain leads on the only live benchmark. Robinhood Chain wins on iOS App Store rating (4.29x vs 4.22x).

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:14:07 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Moonshot

Moonshot is a mobile-first app for buying and selling Solana memecoins via debit card or Apple Pay, targeting retail users who want a CEX-like onboarding experience for onchain tokens.

Robinhood Chain

Robinhood is a US commission-free investing app with 25M+ funded accounts. It added crypto trading in 2018, launched its own L2 chain (Robinhood Chain) in 2025, and is the #1 most-reviewed financial app on the US App Store with nearly 5 million ratings.

Side by side measurements

Crypto trading app iOS ratings: Coinbase vs Robinhood vs Crypto.com vs Bybit, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
Moonshot	4.22x	28.6K
Robinhood Chain	4.29x	4.80M

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

Moonshot vs Robinhood Chain: which one is better?

Moonshot and Robinhood Chain are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Robinhood Chain leads on iOS App Store rating. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is higher-rated, Moonshot or Robinhood Chain?

On the Crypto trading app iOS ratings benchmark, Robinhood Chain leads at 4.29x versus Moonshot at 4.22x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Moonshot vs Robinhood Chain comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.