Fastest free Morph RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsQuickNode
Leads156 ms
- p99
- 156 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 319
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | QuickNode | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 156 ms | 600 ms |
| Singapore | 156 ms | 620 ms |
QuickNode vs Thirdweb
QuickNode leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. QuickNode wins on Fastest free Morph RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (156 ms vs 610 ms).
QuickNode
Morph Foundation's second public RPC (rpc-quicknode.morph.network), operated by QuickNode on behalf of the Morph team. Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP. Runs in parallel with the official Morph endpoint as an active-active pair.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
QuickNode vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
QuickNode and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. QuickNode leads on Fastest free Morph RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free morph rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, QuickNode or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Morph RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, QuickNode leads at 156 ms versus Thirdweb at 610 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the QuickNode vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.