Fastest free Polkadot RPC, live no-key endpoint latency
RPCsOnFinality
Leads55 ms
- p99
- 2.27 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 4,301
Parity
Trails177 ms
- p99
- 1.02 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 4,303
OnFinality vs Parity
OnFinality leads on the only live benchmark. OnFinality wins on Fastest free Polkadot RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (55 ms vs 177 ms).
OnFinality
Multi-chain infrastructure provider. Public keyless endpoints on 80+ networks with generous daily limits, plus dedicated and API-key tiers.
Parity
Parity Technologies is the primary implementation shop behind Polkadot and Substrate, and the operator of the reference public relay RPC at rpc.polkadot.io. Also builds the Polkadot-JS Apps UI, Kusama tooling, and enterprise Substrate deployments.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
OnFinality vs Parity: which one is better?
OnFinality and Parity are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. OnFinality leads on Fastest free Polkadot RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, OnFinality or Parity?
On the Fastest free Polkadot RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, OnFinality leads at 55 ms versus Parity at 177 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the OnFinality vs Parity comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.