Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesOptimism
Trails17.5 min
- p99
- 19.9 min
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 1
Polygon
Leads4.54 s
- p99
- 13.77 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 221
Optimism leads on 1 of 5 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 4. Optimism wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (1.3 min vs 1.9 min). Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.54 s vs 17.5 min), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (12.5 min vs 18.8 min), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.39 s vs 23.56 s), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (28.05 s vs 25.0 min).
Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.
Optimism
Trails17.5 min
Polygon
Leads4.54 s
Optimism
Trails18.8 min
Polygon
Leads12.5 min
Optimism
Leads1.3 min
Polygon
Trails1.9 min
Optimism
Trails23.56 s
Polygon
Leads10.39 s
Optimism
Trails25.0 min
Polygon
Leads28.05 s
Optimism and Polygon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Optimism leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Optimism leads at 1.3 min versus Polygon at 1.9 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 4.54 s versus Optimism at 17.5 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.