Optimism vs Polygon

Optimism leads on 1 of 5 shared benchmarks, Polygon on 4. Optimism wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (1.3 min vs 1.9 min). Polygon wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.54 s vs 17.5 min), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (12.5 min vs 18.8 min), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.39 s vs 23.56 s), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (28.05 s vs 25.0 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Optimism logo
Optimism

Optimistic rollup and the canonical OP Stack reference implementation. 2-second sequencer block time, 7-day fraud-proof window, anchored to Ethereum L1 via batch submissions to the Optimism Portal.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Optimism vs Polygon: which one is better?

Optimism and Polygon are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Optimism leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Polygon leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Optimism or Polygon?

On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Optimism leads at 1.3 min versus Polygon at 1.9 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Optimism or Polygon?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Polygon leads at 4.54 s versus Optimism at 17.5 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Optimism vs Polygon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.