Owlracle vs PublicNode

Name: Owlracle vs PublicNode OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PublicNode leads on the only live benchmark. PublicNode wins on Most accurate gas oracle, live gap vs realized priority fee (0.011 gwei vs 0.015 gwei).

Read methodology Last measured Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:12:51 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Owlracle

Multi-oracle gas aggregator across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon and other EVM chains. Free tier 100 requests/hour, 1000/h with a free API key. Recommendation aggregates several upstream oracles into a single tier value.

PublicNode

Public no-key RPC service operated by Allnodes covering 70+ chains. JSON-RPC and WebSocket endpoints with archive support on most networks.

Side by side measurements

Most accurate gas oracle, live gap vs realized priority fee

RPCs

Owlracle

Trails

0.015 gwei gwei

p99: ~0 gwei
rank: #3
samples: 5,762

PublicNode

Leads

0.011 gwei gwei

p99: 0 gwei
rank: #1
samples: 28,798

Lower gap is NOT the same as "best oracle". Inclusion-confidence oracles (Etherscan) over-predict by design to guarantee inclusion; percentile trackers (PublicNode, Owlracle) hug the realized number by construction. The table therefore ranks on the p99 gap (typical p50 gaps are micro-gwei noise) and pairs it with the covered column: share of time the prediction sat at or above the realized p50, the inclusion-side risk a gap alone cannot show.

Frequently asked questions

Owlracle vs PublicNode: which one is better?

Owlracle and PublicNode are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. PublicNode leads on Most accurate gas oracle, live gap vs realized priority fee. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Owlracle or PublicNode?

On the Most accurate gas oracle, live gap vs realized priority fee benchmark, PublicNode leads at 0.011 gwei versus Owlracle at 0.015 gwei. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Owlracle vs PublicNode comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.